By Frederick Charles Copleston
Read or Download A History of Philosophy [Vol IV] PDF
Best social philosophy books
This booklet makes to be had for the 1st time in English a considerable a part of Otto Neurath's fiscal writings. The essays and small monographs translated right here expand from his pupil years to his final ever accomplished piece. They chart not just Neurath's assorted pursuits within the fiscal heritage of antiquity, in struggle economics and schemes for the socialisation of peacetime economies, within the thought of welfare measures and social signs and in problems with the speculation of collective selection, but in addition express his philosophical pursuits rising in his contributions to seminal debates of the German Social coverage organization.
During this very important and interesting quantity, foreign students current opposing viewpoints to discuss ten of crucial matters in modern social philosophy. offers an unique research of a few of society’s so much urgent matters Written by means of a good forged of foreign students matters lined comprise the character of freedom, the boundaries of non secular tolerance, affirmative motion, parenting, the loss of life penalty, privateness, violence, global starvation, social range, homosexuality, and abortion invitations the reader to take part within the alternate of arguments
Selection of essays with the purpose to readdress the discussion among Hegel and modern philosophy of motion
- Starting with Rousseau
- The Life Cycle of Psychological Ideas: Understanding Prominence and the Dynamics of Intellectual Change (Path in Psychology)
- The Closing of the American Mind
- The New Individualism: The Emotional Costs of Globalisation
- The Law of Nations in Political Thought: A Critical Survey from Vitoria to Hegel
Additional resources for A History of Philosophy [Vol IV]
True, one could hardly expect a Man of the World who dabbled in many branches of philosophy an j letters to A HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY -IV INTRODUCTION give himself to research of this kind. But the comparative absence of the latter constituted a defect none the less. In the second place the eighteenth-century historians were too much inclined to use history as a means of proving a thesis and as a source of moral lessons. Gibbon was concerned to show that the victory of Christianity had been a victory of barbarism and bigotry over enlightened civilization.
What did Descartes understand by philosophy? 'l Under the general heading of philosophy, therefore, Descartes included not only metaphysics but also physics or natural philosophy, the latter standing to the former as trunk to roots. And the branches issuing from this trunk are the other sciences, the three principal ones being medicine, mechanics and morals. '2 It is not surprising that from time to time Descartes insisted on the practical value of philosophy. 3 Again, he speaks of 'opening to each one the road by which he can find in himself, and without borrowing from any other, the whole knowledge which is essential to him for the direction of his life'.
It is no matter for wonder, therefore, if metaphysics makes no progress comparable to that of physical science. The only 'scientific' metaphysics which there can be is the metaphysics of knowledge, the analysis of the a priori elements in human experience. And the greater part of Kant's work consists in an attempt to perform this task of analysis. In The Critiqus of Pure Reason he attempts to analyse the a priori elements which govern the formation of our synthetic a priori judgments. In the Critiqus of Practical Reason he investigates the a priori element in the moral judgment.