By Pascal Massie
Properly opting for and faithfully following his old and smooth resources, Pascal Massie proves himself to be a skilled and loyal advisor for uncovering the ontological foundations of contingency within the worlds of Aristotle and John Duns Scotus.
Read or Download Contingency, Time, and Possibility: An Essay on Aristotle and Duns Scotus PDF
Similar metaphysics books
From Parmenides to Wittgenstein: 1 (The accumulated philosophical papers of G. E. M. Anscombe)
Leibniz's earliest philosophy and its significance for his mature philosophy haven't been tested intimately, relatively within the point of element that possible in achieving through putting Leibniz's philosophy within the context of the resources for 2 of the main easy matters of his philosophical profession: his metaphysics of people and the main oftheir individuation.
Our information of time and temporal houses is a continuing function of wide awake lifestyles. Subjective temporality buildings and publications each point of habit and cognition, distinguishing reminiscence, conception, and anticipation. This milestone quantity brings jointly learn on temporality from major students in philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience, defining a brand new box of interdisciplinary study.
This quantity beneficial properties essays approximately and by means of Paul Benacerraf, whose rules have circulated within the philosophical group because the early nineteen sixties, shaping key components within the philosophy of arithmetic, the philosophy of language, the philosophy of common sense, and epistemology. The ebook all started as a workshop held in Paris on the Collège de France in may possibly 2012 with the participation of Paul Benacerraf.
- Time and Exteriority: Aristotle, Heidegger, Derrida
- Leibniz's 'New System' and Associated Contemporary Texts
- Truthmakers: The Contemporary Debate (Mind Association Occasional Series)
- Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays
Additional info for Contingency, Time, and Possibility: An Essay on Aristotle and Duns Scotus
Newton’s methodology requires us to take very seriously the goal of including the actual world among the possibilities we are addressing, and the metaphysical project set up by Descartes is therefore to be carried out with careful attention to empirical details. One could also challenge the framework of the project (in terms of matter, motion, and laws) or the methodology adopted for carrying it out. For those of an empiricist inclination, seeing the framework and the methodologies in action will be an important part of this assessment.
He is an empiricist, in the sense that all our knowledge comes through our experience; but, for Newton, to know the world through our experiences is not to first know our “experiences” and to then know the world. He is clear that this is a mistake, and he is clear about the methodological implications that follow. Challenges to the significance of Newton’s work for metaphysics should take place within this philosophical context. For example, one could challenge the value of Newton’s contribution to metaphysics by rejecting the goal of Descartes’s metaphysical physics (of giving an account of all the rich variety of the world as we experience it) as being irrelevant to the metaphysics of matter, motion, space, and time.
The issue is whether, for the system of interest, there is any such thing as true time. 16 There are at least two ways in which this could fail. One possibility is that we could get close but not quite there, so that we are left with irregularities that cannot be accounted for either by modifying the time parameter or in terms of forces: we are not able to come up with a satisfactory physical theory using a single time parameter, and so we are unable to supply this empirical warrant for the existence of a true time associated with that system.